Development for whom? Beyond the developed/underdeveloped dichotomy

• Published in: Journal of international relations and development Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 924 - 946
• Main Author: Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Palgrave Macmillan UK 01-12-2020; Palgrave Macmillan
• Subjects: Area Studies; Conceptual development; Dependency; Dependency theory; Development Studies; International Relations; Modernization; Original Article; Personality development; Political action; Political Science and International Relations; Political Science and International Studies; Development studies; Trotsky; Escher; Uneven and combined development; Dependency theory
• ISSN: 1408-6980; 1581-1980
• DOI: 10.1057/s41268-019-00173-9

The developed/underdeveloped dichotomy is the starting point of mainstream theories of development. Based on a theoretical framework inherited from modernisation theories, they represent development as the process through which productive structures in the Global South are transformed following the footsteps of the Global North. Dependency theories productively challenged this linear conception of development, but failed to provide a consistent alternative because of their incapacity to move beyond the developed/underdeveloped dichotomy. In this article, I claim that Trotsky’s concept of uneven and combined development finally indicates a way to think of development beyond the developed/underdeveloped dichotomy. Through analogies with the work of the Dutch artist M. C. Escher, I contrast the concept of uneven and combined development with competing views of development to show both that it makes better sense of particular development trajectories and that it offers a better theoretical base for political action. By stressing the necessarily perspectived character of development, the concept of uneven and combined development makes it possible to ask a crucial question often overlooked: development for whom?