Direct wet mounts versus concentration for routine parasitological examination: are both necessary?

The authors evaluated the usefulness of direct wet mount microscopic examination of stool samples for routine parasitologic diagnosis compared with formalin-ethyl acetate concentration detection. Over a three-year period, there were no instances in which an intestinal parasite was detected only by t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of clinical pathology Vol. 89; no. 3; p. 389
Main Authors: Watson, B, Blitzer, M, Rubin, H, Nachamkin, I
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01-03-1988
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors evaluated the usefulness of direct wet mount microscopic examination of stool samples for routine parasitologic diagnosis compared with formalin-ethyl acetate concentration detection. Over a three-year period, there were no instances in which an intestinal parasite was detected only by the direct wet mount examination. Elimination of routine direct wet mount examinations can reduce laboratory cost and save significant technologist time without decreasing the sensitivity of microscopic examinations for common parasitic agents.
ISSN:0002-9173
DOI:10.1093/ajcp/89.3.389