Lymph node pick up by separate stations: Option or necessity
To evaluate whether lymph node pick up by separate stations could be an indicator of patients submitted to appropriate surgical treatment. One thousand two hundred and three consecutive gastric cancer patients submitted to radical resection in 7 general hospitals and for whom no information was avai...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of gastrointestinal surgery Vol. 7; no. 5; pp. 71 - 77 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
27-05-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To evaluate whether lymph node pick up by separate stations could be an indicator of patients submitted to appropriate surgical treatment.
One thousand two hundred and three consecutive gastric cancer patients submitted to radical resection in 7 general hospitals and for whom no information was available on the extension of lymphatic dissection were included in this retrospective study.
Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, where the stomach specimen was directly formalin-fixed and sent to the pathologist, and group B, where lymph nodes were picked up after surgery and fixed for separate stations. Sixty-two point three percent of group A patients showed < 16 retrieved lymph nodes compared to 19.4% of group B (P < 0.0001). Group B (separate stations) patients had significantly higher survival rates than those in group A [46.1 mo (95%CI: 36.5-56.0) vs 27.7 mo (95%CI: 21.3-31.9); P = 0.0001], independently of T or N stage. In multivariate analysis, group A also showed a higher risk of death than group B (HR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.05-1.46).
Separate lymphatic station dissection increases the number of retrieved nodes, leads to better tumor staging, and permits verification of the surgical dissection. The number of dissected stations could potentially be used as an index to evaluate the quality of treatment received. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Telephone: +39-543-735500 Fax: +39- 543-735522 Correspondence to: Paolo Morgagni, MD, Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Via Forlanini 34, 47121 Forlì, Italy. p.morgagni@ausl.fo.it Author contributions: Morgagni P, Nanni O, Carretta E and Garcea D designed the study; Morgagni P, Nanni O, Carretta E, Altini M, Saragoni L and Falcini F were responsible for data collection; Morgagni P, Nanni O and Carretta E analyzed and interpreted the data; Nanni O and Carretta E performed the statistical analysis; Morgagni P, Nanni O, Carretta E and Saragoni L drafted the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final version of the paper. |
ISSN: | 1948-9366 1948-9366 |
DOI: | 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i5.71 |