Spatial and Quantitative Comparison of Topographically Derived Different Classification Algorithms Using AWiFS Data over Himalayas, India

• Published in: Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Vol. 46; no. 12; pp. 1991 - 2002
• Main Authors: Sood, Vishakha, Gupta, Sheifali, Gusain, Hemendra Singh, Singh, Sartajvir
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Delhi Springer India 01-12-2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Classification; Classifiers; Climatology; Clustering; Data analysis; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Glaciology; Hydrology; Image classification; Mapping; Pixels; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Research Article; Satellite imagery; Snow cover; Spatial analysis; Spatial data; Spatial resolution; Topography; India; Advance Wide Field Sensor (AWiFS) satellite data; Subpixel classification; Topographic correction (TC); Classification algorithms; Himalayas
• ISSN: 0255-660X; 0974-3006
• DOI: 10.1007/s12524-018-0861-4

In recent years, the significant increase in research on spatial information is observed. Classification or clustering is one of the well-known methods in spatial data analysis. Traditionally, classifiers are generally based on per-pixel approaches and are not utilizing the spatial information within pixel, called mixels which is an important source of information to image classification. There are two foremost reasons behind the existence of mixels: (a) coarse or low spatial resolution of sensor and (b) topographic effects that recorded on optical satellite imagery due to differential terrain illuminations over rugged areas such as Himalayas. In the present study, different classification algorithms have been implemented to drive the impact of topography on them. Among various available, three algorithms for the mapping of snow cover region over north Indian Himalayas (India) are compared: (a) maximum likelihood classification (MLC) as supervised classifier; (b)
k
-mean clustering as unsupervised classifier; and (c) linear spectral mixing model (LSMM) as soft classifier. These algorithms have been implemented on AWiFS multispectral data, and analysis was carried out. The classification accuracy is estimated by the error matrices, and LSMM achieved higher accuracy (84.5–88.5%) as compared to MLC (81–84%) and
k
-mean (74–81%). The results highlight that topographically derived classifiers achieved better accuracy in mapping as compared to simple classifiers. The study has many applications in snow hydrology, glaciology and climatology of mountain topography.