Self-assessed understanding of climate change

• Published in: Climatic change Vol. 151; no. 2; pp. 349 - 362
• Main Author: Hamilton, Lawrence C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01-11-2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Atmospheric Sciences; Climate change; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts; Confidence; Dependent variables; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Knowledge; Self assessment; Self evaluation; Surveying; United States > US
• ISSN: 0165-0009; 1573-1480
• DOI: 10.1007/s10584-018-2305-0

Survey researchers often treat self-assessed understanding of climate change as a rough proxy for knowledge, which might affect what people believe about this topic. Self-assessments can be unrealistically high, however, and correlated with politics, so they deserve study in their own right. Turning the usual perspective around to view self-assessed understanding as dependent variable, problematically related to actual knowledge, casts self-assessments in a new light. Analysis of a 2016 US survey that carried a five-item test of very basic, belief-neutral but climate-relevant knowledge (such as knowing about the location of North and South Poles) finds that, at any given level of knowledge, people saying they “understand a great deal” about climate change are more likely to be older, college-educated, and male. Self-assessed understanding exhibits a U-shaped political pattern: highest among liberals and the most conservative, but lowest among moderate conservatives. Among liberal and middle-of-the-road respondents, self-assessed understanding of climate change is positively related to knowledge. Among the most conservative, however, understanding is unrelated or even negatively related to knowledge. For that group in particular, high self-assessed understanding reflects confidence in political views, rather than knowledge about the physical world.