On the Photometric Error Calibration for the Differential Light Curves of Point-like Active Galactic Nuclei

• Published in: Journal of astrophysics and astronomy Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 273 - 296
• Main Authors: Goyal, Arti, Mhaskey, Mukul, Gopal-Krishna, Wiita, Paul J., Stalin, C. S., Sagar, Ram
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Springer India 01-09-2013; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Algorithms; Astronomy; Astrophysics and Astroparticles; Error analysis; Observations and Techniques; Physics; Physics and Astronomy; Stars & galaxies; Photometry: optical—photometry: methods: data analysis—optical: variability—AGN
• ISSN: 0250-6335; 0973-7758
• DOI: 10.1007/s12036-013-9183-7

It is important to quantify the underestimation of rms photometric errors returned by the commonly used APPHOT algorithm in the IRAF software, in the context of differential photometry of point-like AGN, because of the crucial role it plays in evaluating their variability properties. Published values of the underestimation factor,
η
, using several different telescopes, lie in the range 1.3–1.75. The present study aims to revisit this question by employing an exceptionally large data set of 262 differential light curves (DLCs) derived from 262 pairs of non-varying stars monitored under our ARIES AGN monitoring program for characterizing the intra-night optical variability (INOV) of prominent AGN classes. The bulk of these data were taken with the 1-m Sampurnanad Telescope (ST). We find
η
 = 1.54±0.05 which is close to our recently reported value of
η
 = 1.5. Moreover, this consistency holds at least up to a brightness mismatch of 1.5 mag between the paired stars. From this we infer that a magnitude difference of at least up to 1.5 mag between a point-like AGN and comparison star(s) monitored simultaneously is within the same CCD chip acceptable, as it should not lead to spurious claims of INOV.