E64 [trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-(4-guanidino)butane] analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases : investigation of S2 subsite interactions

• Published in: Biochemical journal Vol. 299; no. 2; pp. 389 - 392
• Main Authors: GOUR-SALIN, B. J, LACHANCE, P, MAGNY, M.-C, PLOUFFE, C, MENARD, R, STORER, A. C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Colchester Portland Press 15-04-1994
• Subjects: Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry; Biological and medical sciences; Cathepsin B - antagonists & inhibitors; Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors - pharmacology; Enzymes and enzyme inhibitors; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hydrolases; Kinetics; Leucine - analogs & derivatives; Leucine - pharmacology; Papain - antagonists & inhibitors; Structure-Activity Relationship; Human; Enzyme; Cysteine endopeptidases; Substrate specificity; Cathepsin B; Enzyme inhibitor; Hydrolases; Molecular interaction; Kinetics; Subunit; Proteinases; Substrate analog
• ISSN: 0264-6021; 1470-8728
• DOI: 10.1042/bj2990389

A number of epoxysuccinyl amino acid benzyl esters (HO-Eps-AA-OBzl) and benzyl amides (HO-Eps-AA-NHBzl) (where AA represents amino acid) were synthesized as analogues of E64, a naturally occurring inhibitor of cysteine proteinases. These inhibitors were designed to evaluate if selectivity for cathepsin B could be achieved by varying the amino acid on the basis of known substrate specificity. Contrary to the situation with substrates, it was found that variation of the amino acid in the E64 analogues does not lead to major changes in the kinetic parameter kinac./Ki and that the specificity of these analogues does not parallel that observed for substrates. This is particularly true in the case of the benzyl ester derivatives where the deviation from substrate-like behaviour is more important than with the benzyl amide derivatives. The results suggest that the amide proton of the benzyl amide group in HO-Eps-AA-NHBzl interacts in the S2 subsite in both cathepsin B and papain and contributes to increase the potency of these inhibitors. The kinetic data also suggest that differences in the orientation of the C alpha-C beta bond of the side chain in the S2 subsite of the enzyme might explain the differences between substrate and E64 analogue specificities. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the order of inactivation rates with chloromethane inhibitors (which are believed to be good models of enzyme-substrate interactions) is indeed very similar to that observed with the corresponding amidomethylcoumarin substrates. In conclusion, the information available from S2-P2 interactions with substrates cannot be used to enhance the selectivity of the E64 analogues in a rational manner.