Structural Differences between the Genomes of Deinococcus radiodurans Strains from Different Laboratories

• Published in: Genes Vol. 15; no. 7; p. 847
• Main Authors: Zahradka, Ksenija, Zahradka, Davor, Repar, Jelena
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-07-2024
• Subjects: Accuracy; Chromosomes; Copy number; Deinococcus radiodurans; DNA damage; DNA repair; Double-strand break repair; E coli; Genomes; Genomics; Hypotheses; Insertion sequences; Laboratories; Nucleotide sequence; Phylogenetics; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Transposition; Yeast; structural variation; IS; mobile elements; SNR; alternative end-joining; genome rearrangements
• ISSN: 2073-4425; 2073-4425
• DOI: 10.3390/genes15070847

The bacterium
is known to efficiently and accurately reassemble its genome after hundreds of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Only at very large amounts of radiation-induced DSBs is this accuracy affected in the wild-type
, causing rearrangements in its genome structure. However, changes in its genome structure may also be possible during the propagation and storage of cell cultures. We investigate this possibility by listing structural differences between three completely sequenced genomes of
strains with a recent common ancestor-the type strain stored and sequenced in two different laboratories (of the ATCC 13939 lineage) and the first sequenced strain historically used as the reference (ATCC BAA-816). We detected a number of structural differences and found the most likely mechanisms behind them: (i) transposition/copy number change in mobile interspersed repeats-insertion sequences and small non-coding repeats, (ii) variable number of monomers within tandem repeats, (iii) deletions between long direct DNA repeats, and (iv) deletions between short (4-10 bp) direct DNA repeats. The most surprising finding was the deletions between short repeats because it indicates the utilization of a less accurate DSB repair mechanism in conditions in which a more accurate one should be both available and preferred. The detected structural differences, as well as SNPs and short indels, while being important footprints of deinococcal DNA metabolism and repair, are also a valuable resource for researchers using these
strains.