Exploring the Use of Diary Entries for Qualitative Researchers: Mitigating Challenges When Investigating Sensitive Topics on Indian Women

• Published in: Qualitative report Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. COV1 - 1299
• Main Authors: Mishra, Pavitra, Gupta, Amit
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Fort Lauderdale Nova Southeastern University, Inc 01-05-2024; The Qualitative Report
• Subjects: Analysis; Autobiographical literature; Confidentiality; Credibility; Data analysis; Data collection; Data entry; Diaries; Emotional Experience; Emotions; Employed Women; Ethics; Family conflict; Family work relationship; Female employees; Females; Guilt; Inferences; Interpersonal Relationship; Interviews; Investigations; Methodological problems; Qualitative research; Reciprocity; Reflection; Reflexivity; Researchers; Self disclosure; Well being; Work and family; Work life balance; Working women; India
• ISSN: 2160-3715; 1052-0147; 2160-3715
• DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6330

This study seeks to understand the challenges encountered by qualitative researchers while investigating sensitive topics. We make a valuable contribution to the existing literature on researcher well-being and the mitigation of potential adverse incidents during data collection in studies on sensitive topics. The researchers maintained a comprehensive diary while conducting a study on the sensitive topic of work-family conflict among Indian working women. The analysis of these diary entries revealed three primary categories of challenges: (a) emotional challenges encompassing emotional sustenance, self-awareness, the element of care, building rapport, reciprocity, breaking the connection, preparing for exit, and researcher exhaustion; (b) methodological challenges, including data recording and interview location; (c) ethical challenges, such as confidentiality and guilt; and (d) other challenges, such as establishing credibility as a mainstream researcher in academics. This study aims to raise awareness about the challenges that qualitative researchers face, offering insights into potential dilemmas and explaining how reflexivity, self-disclosure, reciprocity, and a well-planned exit strategy can assist in navigating and addressing researcher biases.