Does social facilitation affect suckling behaviour in zebras?
•Zebra foals suckled longer when seeing another foal suckling too.•Synchronized suckling bouts were less often terminated by mothers.•Interspecific differences were found in synchronised suckling bouts.•Social facilitation, in particular co-action effect, influences zebra’s behaviour. Many recent st...
Saved in:
Published in: | Behavioural processes Vol. 185; p. 104347 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01-04-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Zebra foals suckled longer when seeing another foal suckling too.•Synchronized suckling bouts were less often terminated by mothers.•Interspecific differences were found in synchronised suckling bouts.•Social facilitation, in particular co-action effect, influences zebra’s behaviour.
Many recent studies show that synchronisation of various behaviours are advantageous for group-living mammals. However, studies on synchronisation of suckling behaviour inmonotocous species are nearly absent. We observed 49 individual foals of three zebra species in Dvůr Králové Zoo, and recorded a total of 5 890 suckling bouts, almost one fifth (1 036) of which were synchronised (defined as at least two bouts overlapping at the same time). We found that synchronised suckling bouts lasted longer and were less likely to be terminated by the mother than non-synchronised ones. This is in line with social facilitation theory. In addition the occurrence of synchronised suckling bout differed interspecifically. In plains (Equus quagga) and mountain zebra (E. zebra) the probability of synchronised bouts increased with increasing numbers of foals, whereas the opposite result was found in Grevy’s zebra (E. grevyi). We suggest that the interspecific differences may reflect differences in social organisation of respective species as suckling synchronisation rate was higher in species that form nurseries in the wild. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104347 |