THE PROBLEM OF UNIVERSALS AND THE ASYMMETRY OF INSTANTIATION

Oliver's and Rodriguez-Pereyra's important interpretation of the problem of universals as one concerning truthmakers neglects something crucial: that there is a numerical identity between numerically distinct particulars. The problem of universals is rather how to resolve the apparent cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American philosophical quarterly (Oxford) Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 189 - 202
Main Author: Baxter, Donald L. M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford The University of Illinois Press 01-04-2018
Blackwell Publishers
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Oliver's and Rodriguez-Pereyra's important interpretation of the problem of universals as one concerning truthmakers neglects something crucial: that there is a numerical identity between numerically distinct particulars. The problem of universals is rather how to resolve the apparent contradiction that the same things are both numerically distinct and numerically identical. Baxter's account of instantiation as partial identity resolves the apparent contradiction. A seeming objection to this account is that it appears to make instantiation symmetric, since partial identity is symmetric. Armstrong's standard reply is that the difference between a particular and a universal is what makes instantiation asymmetric. Brown suggests, though, that the instantiation of a universal by a universal is sometimes symmetric. However, the examples on which he relies are not universals.
ISSN:0003-0481
2152-1123
DOI:10.2307/45128612