Effect of membrane electrode assembly characteristics on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack designed for unmanned aerial vehicle applications

A proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack designed for unmanned aerial vehicle applications was used to evaluate the influence of several membrane electrode assembly (MEA) characteristics. MEAs prepared with catalytic layers (CLs) deposited directly on the membrane presented slightly better perform...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of green energy Vol. 21; no. 6; pp. 1226 - 1237
Main Authors: Santos, Diogo F.M., Falcão, Daniela S., Pinto, Alexandra M.F.R., Ferreira, Rui B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 02-05-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack designed for unmanned aerial vehicle applications was used to evaluate the influence of several membrane electrode assembly (MEA) characteristics. MEAs prepared with catalytic layers (CLs) deposited directly on the membrane presented slightly better performance than those with CLs deposited in the gas diffusion layers (GDLs). Thinner membranes were beneficial to the stack performance due to lower activation and ohmic losses. Increasing the Pt loading on the cathode side from 0.5 to 2.0 mg Pt cm −2 did not improve the performance. Small differences were observed between carbon cloth and carbon paper GDLs, possibly due to the presence of a microporous layer (MPL). The hydrophobic treatment of the GDLs improved the performance due to a better humidification of the MEAs. The MPL was found fundamental for a high performance due to an improvement in the electric contact, decreasing ohmic losses. The stack operation under realistic conditions, consisting of a transient energy profile typical of an UAV flight, was also investigated. The stack presented higher dynamic performance than its steady-state one at low currents but slightly lower at high currents. Differences in temperature were observed, which probably contributed to this disparity.
ISSN:1543-5075
1543-5083
DOI:10.1080/15435075.2023.2244062