Comparing different soil fertility systems in Sage (Salvia officinalis) under water deficiency
•It is the first study the response of organic fertilizer in sage under water stress.•Interaction treatment of I2F5 improved content and composition of essential oil.•The highest essential oil content and essential oil yield were obtained in MWD.•Organic fertilizer vs. chemical fertilizer treatment...
Saved in:
Published in: | Industrial crops and products Vol. 74; pp. 20 - 27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier B.V
15-11-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •It is the first study the response of organic fertilizer in sage under water stress.•Interaction treatment of I2F5 improved content and composition of essential oil.•The highest essential oil content and essential oil yield were obtained in MWD.•Organic fertilizer vs. chemical fertilizer treatment reduces the effects of stress.•The costs and environmental pollution were decreased using organic fertilizers.
Sage is a popular medicinal plant which is widely used in cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries. A two years study was conducted to study the effects of different fertility systems on growth and essential oil production of sage under water deficiency. For this purpose, we used a randomized complete block design arranged in split plots with three replications. The maximum of dry matter (2.702±0.15tha−1), essential oil content (1.86±0.10%) and essential oil yield (37.30±3.83lha−1) were obtained in I1 (no stress), I2 (moderate water deficit), and I2 (moderate water deficit), respectively. The highest of dry matter, essential oil content and essential oil yield were obtained in F5 (Vermicompost+N fixing bacteria). Totally, 48 compounds were identified in essential oils of sage by means of GC–MS. 1,8-cineol, α-thujone and camphor were the dominant essential oil compounds which indicated an increasing under I2, F5 and I2×F5 treatments among the three times harvest. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0926-6690 1872-633X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.053 |