Review on building energy performance improvement using phase change materials

•PCMs integrated building envelope and equipment in 2004∼2017 are reviewed.•Melting temperature range of PCMs used for envelope is 10∼39°C.•Melting temperature range of PCMs used for equipment is −15.4∼77°C.•PCMs’ positive effects on energy saving and thermal comfort are demonstrated.•The existing g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy and buildings Vol. 158; pp. 776 - 793
Main Authors: Song, Mengjie, Niu, Fuxin, Mao, Ning, Hu, Yanxin, Deng, Shiming
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01-01-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•PCMs integrated building envelope and equipment in 2004∼2017 are reviewed.•Melting temperature range of PCMs used for envelope is 10∼39°C.•Melting temperature range of PCMs used for equipment is −15.4∼77°C.•PCMs’ positive effects on energy saving and thermal comfort are demonstrated.•The existing gaps in the research works are identified and classified as 5 aspects. Confronted with the crises of the growing resource shortages and continued deterioration of the environment, building energy performance improvement using phase change materials has received much attention in recent years. This review work provides an update on recent developments, 2004∼2017, in phase change materials used to optimize building envelope and equipment. Firstly, a review of building envelope optimization methods by integrating surrounding wall, roof, and floor with phase change materials, is given. This is followed by reporting articles on building equipment optimized with phase change materials to reduce regular energy consumption. Series of air cooling, heating, and ventilation systems coupled with thermal energy storage were comparatively investigated. Finally, the existing gaps in the research works on energy performance improvement with phase change materials were identified, and recommendations offered as authors’ viewpoints in 5 aspects. It was also found that the phase change temperature range of PCMs used was changed from 10∼39°C for envelope to −15.4∼77°C for equipment. We believe this comprehensive review might provide an overview of the analytical tools for scholars, engineers, developers, and policy designers, and shed new light on the designing and performance optimization for PCMs used in building envelope and equipment.
ISSN:0378-7788
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.066