Otoplasty Outcomes With Different Suture Materials in a Rabbit Model

• Published in: The Journal of craniofacial surgery Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 477 - 479
• Main Authors: Taylor, Benjamin A, Hong, Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-03-2016
• Subjects: Animals; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry; Dentistry; Ear Cartilage - pathology; Ear Cartilage - physiology; Ear Cartilage - surgery; Ear, External - pathology; Ear, External - physiology; Ear, External - surgery; Male; Models, Animal; Nylons - chemistry; Pliability; Polyethylene Terephthalates - chemistry; Rabbits; Random Allocation; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods; Sutures
• ISSN: 1049-2275; 1536-3732
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002409

Otoplasty is a commonly performed procedure to correct prominent ears. Many different otoplasty techniques have been described but there is no gold standard technique. As well, many different suture materials are used in otoplasty but studies directly comparing different sutures materials are lacking. An otoplasty outcome study with Nylon and Mersilene (2 of the most commonly used sutures in otoplasty) sutures was conducted using a rabbit model. Each rabbit ear was randomized to receive a Mustardé-type horizontal mattress suture with either 4-0 clear Nylon (N = 12 ears) or 4-0 Mersilene sutures (N = 12 ears). Two weeks after surgery, the auricular bend angle was measured with a finger goniometer and histologic analysis with hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on the rabbit auricular cartilage. Overall, there was no significant difference in the mean bend angle between the 2 groups (Nylon: 135.8°, SD = 22.7° and Mersilene: 143.2°, SD = 19.7°; P = 0.559). Also, no qualitative difference was observed on histologic analysis between the 2 suture groups. In the current rabbit model study, both Nylon and Mersilene sutures performed well and no significant differences were noted.