Earnings growth rates in business valuation models: The impossible quaternity

We develop formulae for earnings growth rates in business valuation models that justify the timing of reinvestment. First, we show that the cross-reference in the calculation between the reinvestment rate (RIR) and return on invested capital (ROIC; i.e., the weighted average of invested capital) int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global finance journal Vol. 60; p. 100930
Main Authors: Kim-Duc, Nguyen, Nam, Pham Khanh
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01-05-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We develop formulae for earnings growth rates in business valuation models that justify the timing of reinvestment. First, we show that the cross-reference in the calculation between the reinvestment rate (RIR) and return on invested capital (ROIC; i.e., the weighted average of invested capital) introduces valuation errors. We then explain the formulae of earnings growth rates to avoid errors in two situations: reinvestment at the end of each year and at any time. The study also shows the timing of capital reinvestment, where the false growth rate occurring due to cross-referencing will match the actual growth rate. We also study the case where the false growth rate is always higher or lower than the actual growth rate. We use numerical examples to show that our models are correct and highlight arising from cross-referencing. We provide a practitioner's guide for two scenarios: valuers directly estimate earnings growth rates and clients provide future earnings and related information. Finally, and most importantly, our results imply the principle of impossible quaternity for estimating earnings growth in the discounted cash flow (DCF) framework. More specifically, a business valuation cannot have an available expected growth rate, a fixed change in ROIC, an independent reinvestment timing, and a fixed level of actual reinvestment.
ISSN:1044-0283
1873-5665
DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100930