Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics

Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delinea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political studies Vol. 72; no. 3; pp. 845 - 861
Main Author: Meyer, John M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-08-2024
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delineate a range of responses to the challenges of climate politics in populist times. In doing so, I have two primary aims: first, to highlight limitations of “anti-populist” responses among proponents of climate change action, and, second, to lean into populist criticisms of elite expertise, by delineating how some challenges to dominant forms of science and elite power are themselves expert knowledge and integral to promising movements that address climate change. This can allow expertise to be distinguished from elitism and to be recognized in caring relations to the subjects of knowledge. Here, expertise is not manifest as separation from the common world, but as immersion in it.
ISSN:0032-3217
1467-9248
DOI:10.1177/00323217231160370