Machine learning-assisted characterization of electroless deposited Ni–P particles on nano/micro SiC particles
In this experiment, Ni–P nanoparticles were deposited (ED) on SiC micro- and nanoparticles with different parameters. Our goal was to successfully prepare metal deposits and develop an effective method for comparing and evaluating the various procedures. During the experimental work, a three-step el...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ceramics international Vol. 49; no. 18; pp. 29849 - 29856 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
15-09-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this experiment, Ni–P nanoparticles were deposited (ED) on SiC micro- and nanoparticles with different parameters. Our goal was to successfully prepare metal deposits and develop an effective method for comparing and evaluating the various procedures.
During the experimental work, a three-step electroless Ni–P coating process was applied with different concentrations. The coated SiC particles were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mass-specific surface area (SSA) of the coated SiC was measured by the Brunauer‒Emmett‒Teller (BET) method, while the volumetric-specific surface area (VSSA) was also calculated. The adhesion between the metal and the ceramic particle was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
An image processing macroprogram was created (with a machine learning-based Trainable Weka Segmentation algorithm) to segment the SEM images of the ED metal particles to calculate the specific surface area (SV).
[Display omitted]
•Electroless Ni–P particles were deposited on SiC micro- and nanoparticles with different parameters.•X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to analyze the adhesion between the metal and ceramic particles.•A machine learning-assisted image processing macro program was created to segment the ED metal particles.•SSA (m2/g), VSSA (m2/cm3), SV (m2/cm3) and distribution of metal particle diameter were compared. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0272-8842 1873-3956 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.242 |