Replacing an Implant-Based with a DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Breast Sensation and Quality of Life

In this cohort study, the authors compared breast sensation and quality of life (QoL) after replacement of an implant-based breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in a singular sample of women. Women with implant-based breast reconstruction before...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) Vol. 152; no. 2; pp. 293 - 304
Main Authors: van Rooij, Joep A. F., Bijkerk, Ennie, van der Hulst, René R. J. W., van Kuijk, Sander M. J., Tuinder, Stefania M. H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-08-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this cohort study, the authors compared breast sensation and quality of life (QoL) after replacement of an implant-based breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in a singular sample of women. Women with implant-based breast reconstruction before their DIEP flap were included. Women formed their own control. Breast sensation was measured using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. QoL was evaluated using BREAST-Q questionnaires. Preoperative (T0) sensation and QoL were compared with postoperative values at 6 months (T1), at 12 months (T2), and at maximum follow-up (Tmax, sensation only). A linear mixed effects regression was used for Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments measurements; a paired samples t test was used for BREAST-Q scores. Most women chose replacement of their implant by a DIEP flap because of implant-related complaints. Postoperative sensation decreased significantly compared with preoperative sensation after T1 (mean, 5.1 months), T2 (mean, 14.6 months), and Tmax (mean, 17.6 months) for the total breast but recovers to preoperative levels for the native skin after an average of 1.5 years. Nerve coaptation positively influenced recovery of sensation. BREAST-Q scores increased significantly after 6 and 12 months over the domains Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, Physical Well-Being of the Chest, and Sexual Well-Being. Scores decreased significantly in Physical Well-Being of the Abdomen after 6 months. Replacing an implant with a DIEP flap initially causes a decrease in overall breast sensation, gradually recovering to preoperative levels for native skin, and can significantly increase QoL with the right indication. Superior recovery of sensation and QoL may be obtained by accompanying the DIEP flap with nerve coaptation. Therapeutic, IV.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0032-1052
1529-4242
DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010315