Natural histories of patients with Wolf‐Hirschhorn syndrome derived from variable chromosomal abnormalities

• Published in: Congenital anomalies Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 169 - 173
• Main Authors: Yamamoto‐Shimojima, Keiko, Kouwaki, Masanori, Kawashima, Yuki, Itomi, Kazuya, Momosaki, Ken, Ozasa, Shiro, Okamoto, Nobuhiko, Yokochi, Kenji, Yamamoto, Toshiyuki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kyoto, Japan John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01-09-2019; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: 4p‐syndrome; Abnormalities; Adolescent; Adult; autism; Child; Child, Preschool; Chromosome 4; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome deletion; Chromosome Mapping; Chromosome translocations; Chromosomes; Correlation analysis; Facies; Female; Genetic Association Studies - methods; Genotypes; growth failure; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; microarray; Patients; Phenotype; Phenotypes; Seizures; subtelomeric deletion; Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome - diagnosis; Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome - genetics; Young Adult; 4p-syndrome; growth failure; microarray; subtelomeric deletion; autism
• ISSN: 0914-3505; 1741-4520
• DOI: 10.1111/cga.12318

Wolf‐Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a subtelomeric deletion syndrome affecting the short arm of chromosome 4. The main clinical features are a typical craniofacial appearance, growth deficiency, developmental delays, and seizures. Previous genotype‐phenotype correlation analyses showed some candidate regions for each clinical finding. The WHS critical region has been narrowed into the region 2 Mb from the telomere, which includes LETM1 and WHSC1; however, this region is insufficient to cause “typical WHS facial appearance”. In this study, we identified 10 patients with a deletion involving 4p16.3. Five patients showed pure terminal deletions and three showed unbalanced translocations. The remaining patients showed an interstitial deletion and a suspected inverted‐duplication‐deletion. Among 10 patients, one patient did not show “typical WHS facial appearance” although his interstitial deletion included LETM1 and WHSC1. On the other hand, another patient exhibited “typical WHS facial appearance” although her small deletion did not include LETM1 and WHSC1. Instead, FGFRL1 was considered as the candidate for this finding. The largest deletion of 34.7 Mb was identified in a patient with the most severe phenotype of WHS.