A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study of Neuroticism and Sleep Bruxism

• Published in: Journal of dental research Vol. 103; no. 10; pp. 980 - 987
• Main Authors: Strausz, T., Strausz, S., Jones, S.E., Palotie, T., Lobbezoo, F., Ahlberg, J., Ollila, H.M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-09-2024; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Comorbidity; Dental disorders; Genetic diversity; Neurosis; Phenotypes; Pleiotropy; Population studies; Research Reports; Risk factors; Sensitivity analysis; Sleep; anxiety; population register; depression; psychologic stress; Molecular Epidemiology; genome-wide association study
• ISSN: 0022-0345; 1544-0591; 1544-0591
• DOI: 10.1177/00220345241264749

Sleep bruxism (SB) affects a considerable part of the population and is associated with neuroticism, stress, and anxiety in various studies. However, the causal mechanisms between neuroticism and SB have not been examined. Understanding the reasons for SB is important as understanding bruxism may allow improved comprehensive management of the disorders and comorbidities related to it. Previous studies on the association of risk factors to SB have provided important symptomatic insight but were mainly questionnaire based or limited in sample size and could not adequately assess causal relationships. The aim of this study was to elaborate the possible causal relationship of neuroticism as a risk factor for SB through a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach by combining questionnaires, registry data, and genetic information in large scale. We performed a two-sample MR study using instrumental genetic variants of neuroticism, including neuroticism subcategories, in the UK Biobank (n = 380,506) and outcome data of probable SB using FinnGen (n [cases/controls] = 12,297/364,980). We discovered a causal effect from neuroticism to SB (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38 [1.10–1.74], P = 0.0057). A phenotype sensitive to stress and adversity had the strongest effect (OR = 1.59 [1.17–2.15], P = 0.0028). Sensitivity analyses across MR methods supported a causal relationship, and we did not observe pleiotropy between neuroticism and SB (MR-Egger intercept, P = 0.87). Our findings are in line with earlier observational studies that connect stress and SB. Furthermore, our results provide evidence that neurotic traits increase the risk of probable SB.