Fidelity to Best Practices of Psychiatric Assessments in Army Behavioral Health Settings

While civilian and military psychiatric clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist for psychiatric assessments, data are lacking on providers’ adherence to these criteria. This study evaluated the use of psychiatric CPGs’ assessment criteria by Army behavioral health providers (BHPs). In a weighted c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of psychiatric practice Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 103 - 117
Main Authors: WILLIAMS, JUINELL B., TOBLIN, ROBIN L., DUFFY, FARIFTEH F., SHANNAHOFF, MOLLY E., WILK, JOSHUA E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved 01-03-2019
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While civilian and military psychiatric clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist for psychiatric assessments, data are lacking on providers’ adherence to these criteria. This study evaluated the use of psychiatric CPGs’ assessment criteria by Army behavioral health providers (BHPs). In a weighted cross-sectional survey, 348 BHPs were evaluated on their assessment of a systematically selected patient on 15 total domains recommended by the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense CPGs for substance use disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder. The proportion of BHPs providing high-quality assessment and the association between high-quality assessment and BHP and patient characteristics were examined. Using the weighted sample, 80% of BHPs provided a high-quality assessment. BHPs who saw ≥20 patients per week were significantly more likely to provide high-quality assessments compared with BHPs who saw <20 patients per week [odds ratio (OR)=1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.01-2.92]. Patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder [adjusted OR (AOR)=0.42, 95% CI=0.18-0.96] or whose BHPs did not assess patients’ current overall physical health (AOR=0.26, 95% CI=0.07-0.97) or lifetime duration of treatment for mental health (AOR=0.03, 95% CI=0.01-0.20) were less likely to receive high-quality assessments. A majority of Army BHPs are conducting high-quality assessments for the 3 most common mental disorders in military populations. If recommendations to increase fidelity to assessment could be implemented, more patients could receive optimized care.
ISSN:1538-1145
1538-1145
DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000365