Determination of Nitrite in Processed Meat Using Digital Image Method and Powdered Reagent

•Spot color reactions based on chrysoline resorcinol azo dye.•Development of a new DIB method.•Application to nitrite determination in processed meat.•Comparison to official AOAC 937.31 reference method. A novel analytical approach for the rapid determination of nitrite in processed meat was develop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of food composition and analysis Vol. 81; pp. 28 - 36
Main Authors: Azeem, Sami M. Abdel, Madbouly, Magdy D., El-Shahat, Mohamed F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01-08-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Spot color reactions based on chrysoline resorcinol azo dye.•Development of a new DIB method.•Application to nitrite determination in processed meat.•Comparison to official AOAC 937.31 reference method. A novel analytical approach for the rapid determination of nitrite in processed meat was developed. A yellow to reddish orange colored spots from chrysoline resorcinol azo dye created and photographed using the digital image based (DIB) method. The spots resulted from the reaction of nitrite with a powdered reagent consists of a ground solid mixture of sulfanilic acid and resorcinol. Quantification of nitrite was obtained using ImageJ software containing RGB color model. The limit of detection (LOD), quantification (LOQ) and the linear analytical range were 0.5, 1.7 mg L-1 and 2.0-60 mg L-1 (R = 0.990), respectively. Also, using the dissolved spot (DS) method followed by a spectrophotometric measurement afforded a LOD, LOQ and linear analytical range of 0.04 and 1.3 mg L-1 and 1.5-80 (R = 0.993), respectively. The developed methods were applied to the determination of nitrite residue in commercial chicken sausages, luncheon meat, luncheon chicken, and luncheon turkey and beef samples with satisfied accuracy. The results obtained by the DIB and DS methods were compared to the official AOAC 973.31 method and showed no significant differences. The corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients (R2) for spiked beef extract are 0.994 and 0.997, respectively.
ISSN:0889-1575
1096-0481
DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2019.05.003