Elimination of bacteria from semen using a combination of density gradient centrifugation and swim-up
Background: To evaluate the efficiency of bacterial clearance of different sperm preparation procedure. Methods: A total of 46 semen samples were collected in this study, each semen sample was divided into four equal parts (0.5 mL each). The first part was prepared by density-gradient centrifugation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Men's Health Vol. 18; no. 6; p. 1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MRE Press
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: To evaluate the efficiency of bacterial clearance of different sperm preparation procedure. Methods: A total of 46 semen samples were collected in this study, each semen sample was divided into four equal parts (0.5 mL each). The first part was prepared by density-gradient centrifugation (D-group), the second part was prepared by swim-up (S-group), the third part was treated with density-gradient centrifugation combined with swim-up (D+S-group), and the fourth group was the original raw semen group (O-group) regarded as the control. After each semen preparation procedure, the O-group and suspensions were inoculated and incubated for bacterial identification and colony counting. Results: Initially only 8.7% (4/46) of samples were bacteria free. After processing, the bacterial clearance rates were 23.8% for D-group, 57.4% for S-group and 97.8% for D+S-group (p < 0.001). Multiple bacterial strains were observed in 37 samples with 117 different bacterial strains in all identified in the original semen. 44.4% of the staphylococci and 89.7% of streptococci were not eliminated in D-group. In S-group, the corresponding rates were 24.4% and 35.9%. In D+S-group there were no remaining strains of staphylococci and only 2.6% of streptococci remained. After the combined procedure, the number of bacterial colonies fell dramatically after processing. Conclusion: The combined D+S protocol appears to be substantially more efficient than either method alone in eliminating bacteria from semen samples. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1875-6867 1875-6859 |
DOI: | 10.31083/j.jomh1806124 |