General estimation method for lower flammability limits of organic compounds: The simpler the better

Due to the lack of well-established procedures to estimate the lower flammability limit (LFL) of arbitrary fuel-air mixtures, we report therein a simple method derived from a relationship introduced over 80 years ago for C–H–O molecules and presently extended to molecules containing C–H–N–O–F–Cl–Br–...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fuel (Guildford) Vol. 342; p. 127753
Main Authors: Maury, Mathilda, Mathieu, Didier, Jacquemin, Johan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 15-06-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Due to the lack of well-established procedures to estimate the lower flammability limit (LFL) of arbitrary fuel-air mixtures, we report therein a simple method derived from a relationship introduced over 80 years ago for C–H–O molecules and presently extended to molecules containing C–H–N–O–F–Cl–Br–I–Si–P–S elements. The LFL was usually found to represent a constant fraction α≃1/2 of the stoichiometric concentration of fuel, except for halogen compounds for which α increases with the fraction of halogen atoms in the fuel molecules. Interestingly, this extremely simple scheme, which could be then easily integrated into any molecule design workflow, indicates that LFL values are mainly determined by the element count on the fuel structure, in sharp contrast with the premises underlying quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) and group contribution (GC) approaches. •Element counts yield extremely simple and accurate lower flammability limit estimates.•Standard molecular descriptors mostly irrelevant as they reflect structural formula.•Lower flammability limit is half the stoichiometric fuel concentration in most cases.•Halogen atoms increase the lower flammability limit from this nominal value.•Experimental uncertainties hamper further improvement in estimation methods.
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127753