Extracting the True Cosmic-ray Relative Intensity Sky Map from Normalized Relative Intensity Data Measured by Air Shower Experiments

• Published in: The Astrophysical journal Vol. 970; no. 2; pp. 134 - 143
• Main Authors: Maalal, N. D., Zhang, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia The American Astronomical Society 01-08-2024; IOP Publishing
• Subjects: Anisotropy; Astronomical maps; Computational methods; Cosmic ray anisotropy; Cosmic ray intensities; Cosmic ray showers; Cosmic rays; Dipoles; Galactic cosmic rays; Heliosphere; Interstellar magnetic fields; Magnetic fields; Regression models; Response functions; Star maps; Statistical tests; Tibet
• ISSN: 0004-637X; 1538-4357
• DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4ffd

Abstract We use data from the Tibet AS γ experiment for 4 teraelectronvolt (TeV) cosmic rays as an example to perform a nonlinear interstellar distribution model regression according to the way the observed anisotropy is typically presented, from which we extract normalization factors that allow us to obtain a true relative intensity sky map from the measurements. By using various test statistics, we show that the nonlinear fit significantly outperforms the direct linear fit in its ability to model cosmic-ray anisotropy. The procedure also allows us to produce normalization constants that can trace minute latitudinal variations of experimental response to cosmic-ray intensity. Applying the correction of the latitudinal response function to the Tibet AS γ data, we generate a sky map of true relative intensity. As a result, we observe that the measured and corrected sky maps show significant differences in intensity and angular spectral power. Our full anisotropy sky map of true relative intensity contradicts the assumption that the latitudinal variation in longitudinally averaged flux is negligible. The result further confirms that TeV cosmic-ray anisotropy is dominated by a dipole ( ℓ = 1) aligned with the interstellar magnetic field’s direction. Our results also confirm the existence of much weaker middle-scale interstellar anisotropy between ℓ = 2 and ℓ = 13.