Ranking of natural disasters in Sri Lanka for mitigation planning

• Published in: International journal of disaster resilience in the built environment Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 115 - 132
• Main Authors: Wickramaratne, Sanjeewa, Ruwanpura, Janaka, Ranasinghe, Upul, Walawe-Durage, Samanthi, Adikariwattage, Varuna, Wirasinghe, S.C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bingley Emerald Group Publishing Limited 13-07-2012
• Subjects: Area classification; Classification; Correlation analysis; Design engineering; Disaster management; Disasters; Earthquakes; Emergency preparedness; Fatalities; Geographical distribution; Gravity; Infrastructure; Injuries; Landslides & mudslides; Methodology; Mitigation; Natural disasters; Ratings & rankings; Showcases; Storm damage; Studies; Tornadoes; Workshops; Disaster mitigation; Sri Lanka; Droughts; Classification; Early warning; Floods; Tsunamis; Natural disasters
• ISSN: 1759-5908; 1759-5916
• DOI: 10.1108/17595901211245198

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a methodology for a priori classification of natural disasters that occur in Sri Lanka, through the development of a set of weighted parameters based on the product of the disaster impact and the affected area, in order to prepare mitigation plans.Design methodology approach - Experts' opinions were used for developing the parameters. Through a facilitated workshop, the weights of the disasters were obtained from experts involved in disaster mitigation at the local, regional and national levels in Sri Lanka. A correlation analysis was used to determine the most appropriate independent measures of disaster impact and affected area, the product of which was used to rank the identified disasters for further action.Findings - For the pre-selection of major disasters, the study showcases four weighted parameters, one of which is identified as the best. In total, five disasters have been singled out for further consideration in Sri Lanka. The product of the affected area factor, based on administrative area classification, and the impact factor, out of the two considered, that places a higher weight on minor disasters, is shown to be the best criterion.Research limitations implications - The geographical distribution of the participants (experts) does influence the results, and those available for the workshop were not fully representative of all Sri Lanka's provinces.Originality value - The paper emphasizes the importance of the consideration of the area impacted rather than the classification, which is based solely on the severity of the impact. The categorization of disasters based on experts' opinions and the related analysis revealed a priority order for planning for certain identified disasters.