Effect of residual monomer content on some properties of a poly(methyl methacrylate)-based bone cement

Through this article, the degree of polymerization attainable in a commercial acrylic bone cement based on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and gas chromatography (GC). The results obtained revealed a marked dependence between the maximum m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied polymer science Vol. 69; no. 7; pp. 1367 - 1383
Main Authors: Vallo, C. I., Montemartini, P. E., Cuadrado, T. R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 15-08-1998
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Through this article, the degree of polymerization attainable in a commercial acrylic bone cement based on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and gas chromatography (GC). The results obtained revealed a marked dependence between the maximum monomer conversion and the cure temperature. Specimens for the mechanical evaluation of the cement were subjected to two different cure conditions: one set of samples was allowed to cure at room temperature and an additional set was also postcured at 140°C for 2 h. The latter thermal treatment permitted one to discard the presence of the unreacted monomer in the hardened material. The effect of the unreacted monomer on the mechanical behavior was evaluated by measuring the flexural modulus (E), the compressive yield stress (σy), and the fracture toughness (KIC). Samples prepared at room temperature for mechanical evaluation contained residual monomer which acts as a plasticizer of the matrix, increasing KIC and decreasing E and σy. The cure temperature and mold di‐mensions influence the amount of the residual monomer in the hardened material. Thus, differences in the values of the mechanical properties measured for the same commercial formulation may be attributed to a different mold dimension used in the test. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 1367–1383, 1998
Bibliography:ArticleID:APP12
istex:B030784E5A54FF05B536DDDFDA8BE159954FA213
National Research Council (CONICET)
ark:/67375/WNG-0NLXD9F1-F
ISSN:0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980815)69:7<1367::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-R