Enforcing continuous symmetries in physics-informed neural network for solving forward and inverse problems of partial differential equations

• Published in: Journal of computational physics Vol. 492; p. 112415
• Main Authors: Zhang, Zhi-Yong, Zhang, Hui, Zhang, Li-Sheng, Guo, Lei-Lei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01-11-2023
• Subjects: Invariant surface conditions; Lie symmetry; Partial differential equations; Symmetry-enhanced physics-informed neural network; Invariant surface conditions; Symmetry-enhanced physics-informed neural network; Partial differential equations; Lie symmetry
• ISSN: 0021-9991; 1090-2716
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112415

As a typical application of deep learning, physics-informed neural network (PINN) has been successfully used to find numerical solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs), but how to improve the limited accuracy is still a great challenge for PINN. In this work, we introduce a new method, symmetry-enhanced physics informed neural network (SPINN) where the invariant surface conditions induced by the Lie symmetries or non-classical symmetries of PDEs are embedded into the loss function in PINN, to improve the accuracy of PINN for solving the forward and inverse problems of PDEs. We test the effectiveness of SPINN for the forward problem via two groups of ten independent numerical experiments using different numbers of collocation points and neurons per layer for the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation, breaking soliton equation, heat equation, and potential Burgers equations respectively, and for the inverse problem by considering different layers and neurons as well as different numbers of training points with different levels of noise for the Burgers equation in potential form. The numerical results show that SPINN performs better than PINN with fewer training points and simpler architecture of neural network, and in particular, exhibits superiorities than the PINN method and the two-stage PINN method of Lin and Chen by considering the Sawada-Kotera equation. Furthermore, we discuss the computational overhead of SPINN in terms of the relative computational cost to PINN and show that the training time of SPINN has no obvious increases, even less than PINN for certain cases.
•Introducing the symmetry-enhanced PINN (SPINN) to improve the accuracy of the PINN.•SPINN outperforms than PINN with fewer training points and simpler architecture of neural network.•The training time of SPINN for PDEs has no obvious increases, even less than the one of PINN.