Ideological Congruence: Illusion or Imperfection?

Paul Warwick () argues that much of the research on ideological congruence leaves the erroneous impression that a close match of median left‐right voter opinions and government ideological positions usually emerges from elections. I propose further clarifications. I offer a “natural metric” based on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Legislative studies quarterly Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 21 - 32
Main Author: Powell, G. Bingham
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Iowa City Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-02-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Paul Warwick () argues that much of the research on ideological congruence leaves the erroneous impression that a close match of median left‐right voter opinions and government ideological positions usually emerges from elections. I propose further clarifications. I offer a “natural metric” based on the average distances from the median voter of the most distant and the closest parties competing in all these countries’ elections. I suggest that by these standards average ideological congruence in the Western liberal democracies in the last 20 years has been fairly successful, but not as successful as it could be.
ISSN:0362-9805
1939-9162
DOI:10.1111/lsq.12177