Barriers and facilitators to parents' engagement with and perceived impact of a childhood obesity app: A mixed-methods study

• Published in: PLOS digital health Vol. 3; no. 3; p. e0000481
• Main Authors: Milne-Ives, Madison, Rahman, Em, Bradwell, Hannah, Baines, Rebecca, Boey, Timothy, Potter, Alison, Lawrence, Wendy, Helena van Velthoven, Michelle, Meinert, Edward
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 01-03-2024; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Behavior; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomedical research; Consent; Editorials; Ethnicity; Families & family life; Funding; Global health; Health care; Health education; Health promotion; Intervention; Medicine and Health Sciences; Obesity; Overweight; Parents & parenting; People and Places; Public health; Questionnaires; Research and Analysis Methods; Research ethics; Self-efficacy; Social Sciences; Telemedicine; Weight control; Workforce; United Kingdom > UK; England
• ISSN: 2767-3170; 2767-3170
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000481

Childhood obesity is a growing global health concern. Although mobile health apps have the potential to deliver behavioural interventions, their impact is commonly limited by a lack of sufficient engagement. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement with a family-focused app and its perceived impact on motivation, self-efficacy, and behaviour. Parents with at least one child under 18 and healthcare professionals working with children were recruited; all participants were allocated to use the NoObesity app over a 6-month period. The mixed-methods design was based on the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance frameworks. Qualitative and quantitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and app use data (logins and in-app self-reported data). 35 parents were included in the final analysis; quantitative results were analysed descriptively and thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data. Key barriers to engagement were boredom, forgetting, and usability issues and key barriers to potential impact on behaviours were accessibility, lack of motivation, and family characteristics. Novelty, gamification features, reminders, goal setting, progress monitoring and feedback, and suggestions for healthy foods and activities were key facilitators to engagement with the app and behaviours. A key observation was that intervention strategies could help address many motivation and capability barriers, but there was a gap in strategies addressing opportunity barriers. Without incorporating strategies that successfully mitigate barriers in all three determinants of behaviour, an intervention is unlikely to be successful. We highlight key recommendations for developers to consider when designing the features and implementation of digital health interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05261555).