Developing an Audit and Feedback Dashboard for Family Physicians: User-Centered Design Process

• Published in: JMIR human factors Vol. 10; p. e47718
• Main Authors: Shuldiner, Jennifer, Kiran, Tara, Agarwal, Payal, Daneshvarfard, Maryam, Eldridge, Kirsten, Kim, Susie, Greiver, Michelle, Jokhio, Iffat, Ivers, Noah
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada JMIR Publications 09-11-2023
• Subjects: Algorithms; Best practice; Burnout, Psychological; Cognitive load; Diabetes; Feedback; Humans; Learning; Literary characters; Physicians; Physicians, Family; Primary care; Quality improvement; User-Centered Design; user-centered; development; clinical performance; implementation; users; feedback; audit; design; audit and feedback; family physician; primary care; dashboard; care
• ISSN: 2292-9495; 2292-9495
• DOI: 10.2196/47718

Audit and feedback (A&F), the summary and provision of clinical performance data, is a common quality improvement strategy. Successful design and implementation of A&F-or any quality improvement strategy-should incorporate evidence-informed best practices as well as context-specific end user input.
We used A&F theory and user-centered design to inform the development of a web-based primary care A&F dashboard. We describe the design process and how it influenced the design of the dashboard.
Our design process included 3 phases: prototype development based on A&F theory and input from clinical improvement leaders; workshop with family physician quality improvement leaders to develop personas (ie, fictional users that represent an archetype character representative of our key users) and application of those personas to design decisions; and user-centered interviews with family physicians to learn about the physician's reactions to the revised dashboard.
The team applied A&F best practices to the dashboard prototype. Personas were used to identify target groups with challenges and behaviors as a tool for informed design decision-making. Our workshop produced 3 user personas, Dr Skeptic, Frazzled Physician, and Eager Implementer, representing common users based on the team's experience of A&F. Interviews were conducted to further validate findings from the persona workshop and found that (1) physicians were interested in how they compare with peers; however, if performance was above average, they were not motivated to improve even if gaps compared to other standards in their care remained; (2) burnout levels were high as physicians are trying to catch up on missed care during the pandemic and are therefore less motivated to act on the data; and (3) additional desired features included integration within the electronic medical record, and more up-to-date and accurate data.
We found that carefully incorporating data from user interviews helped operationalize generic best practices for A&F to achieve an acceptable dashboard that could meet the needs and goals of physicians. We demonstrate such a design process in this paper. A&F dashboards should address physicians' data skepticism, present data in a way that spurs action, and support physicians to have the time and capacity to engage in quality improvement work; the steps we followed may help those responsible for quality improvement strategy implementation achieve these aims.