Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure : The PRECISE trial

• Published in: Circulation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 94; no. 11; pp. 2793 - 2799
• Main Authors: PACKER, M, COLUCCI, W. S, GOTTLIEB, S. S, PEARLE, D, CODY, R. J, GREGORY, J. J, KANTROWITZ, N. E, LEJEMTEL, T. H, YOUNG, S. T, LUKAS, M. A, SHUSTERMAN, N. H, SACKNER-BERNSTEIN, J. D, LIANG, C.-S, GOLDSCHER, D. A, FREEMAN, I, KUKIN, M. L, KINHAL, V, UDELSON, J. E, KLAPHOLZ, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-12-1996; American Heart Association, Inc
• Subjects: Antiarythmic agents; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiovascular system; Medical sciences; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Human; Heart failure; Chemotherapy; Treatment; Heart disease; Carvedilol; Cardiovascular disease; Severity score; Antiarrhythmic agent; Beta blocking agent
• ISSN: 0009-7322; 1524-4539
• DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.11.2793

Background
Carvedilol has improved the symptomatic status of patients with moderate to severe heart failure in single-center studies, but its clinical effects have not been evaluated in large, multicenter trials.
Methods and Results
We enrolled 278 patients with moderate to severe heart failure (6-minute walk distance, 150 to 450 m) and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 at 31 centers. After an open-label, run-in period, each patient was randomly assigned (double-blind) to either placebo (n=145) or carvedilol (n=133; target dose, 25 to 50 mg BID) for 6 months, while background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor remained constant. Compared with placebo, patients in the carvedilol group had a greater frequency of symptomatic improvement and lower risk of clinical deterioration, as evaluated by changes in the NYHA functional class (
P
=.014) or by a global assessment of progress judged either by the patient (
P
=.002) or by the physician (
P
<.001). In addition, treatment with carvedilol was associated with a significant increase in ejection fraction (
P
<.001) and a significant decrease in the combined risk of morbidity and mortality (
P
=.029). In contrast, carvedilol therapy had little effect on indirect measures of patient benefit, including changes in exercise tolerance or quality-of-life scores. The effects of the drug were similar in patients with ischemic heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy as the cause of heart failure.
Conclusions
These findings indicate that, in addition to its favorable effects on survival, carvedilol produces important clinical benefits in patients with moderate to severe heart failure treated with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor. (Circulation. 1996;94:2793-2799.)