Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Review of Pros and Cons

• Published in: Seminars in liver disease Vol. 42; no. 1; p. 104
• Main Authors: Terzi, Eleonora, Ayuso, Carmen, Piscaglia, Fabio, Bruix, Jordi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-02-2022
• Subjects: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology; Contrast Media; Humans; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Liver Neoplasms - pathology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1098-8971
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732356

The American College of Radiology has released the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) scheme which categorizes focal liver lesions (FLLs) in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the degree of risk of nodules to be HCC. It subgroups FLL in LR-1 (definitely benign), LR-2 (probably benign), LR-3 (intermediate probability of malignancy), LR-4 (probably HCC), LR-5 (definitely HCC), and LR-M (probable malignancy not specific for HCC). Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm have the goal to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, reporting, and data collection for imaging examinations in patients at risk for HCC. Nevertheless, there remain controversial issues that should be dealt with. The aim of this review is to discuss the pros and cons of the interpretation and reporting part of CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm to permit future refinements of the scheme and optimize patient and nodule management.