Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Superpixel Feature Subdivision and Adaptive Graph Structure
The graph-based hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) method has attracted wide attention because it can extract information with a non-Euclidean structure. Many graph-based HSIC works have achieved good results, but unresolved technical issues remain. For example, many graph nodes lead to high...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing Vol. 60; pp. 1 - 15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
IEEE
2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The graph-based hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) method has attracted wide attention because it can extract information with a non-Euclidean structure. Many graph-based HSIC works have achieved good results, but unresolved technical issues remain. For example, many graph nodes lead to high computational costs, and the mining of non-Euclidean structures is not sufficient. To solve these problems, we propose a graph attention network with an adaptive graph structure mining (GAT-AGSM) approach. Specifically, we first propose an HSIC framework with a superpixel feature subdivision (SFS) mechanism. In this framework, the number of nodes in the graph structure is reduced by using superpixel segmentation algorithms, and the SFS mechanism is designed to generate finer classification results. Second, we design the spatial-spectral attention layer with an adaptive graph structure mining (AGSM) mechanism for the graph attention network. The spatial-spectral attention layer can filter information in both spatial and spectral dimensions. The AGSM mechanism requires less manual intervention to dynamically generate non-Euclidean graph structures that better aggregate information. We conduct excessive experiments to compare the proposed GAT-AGSM with seven nongraph methods and three graph-based methods on widely used datasets. On the Indian Pines, Pavia University, and Salinas datasets, compared to the comparison method, the overall accuracy of GAT-AGSM is improved by at least 4.26%, 2.59%, and 1.41%, respectively. Experimental results show that GAT-AGSM has the best performance compared to the baselines in terms of various metrics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-2892 1558-0644 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3153446 |