Microgravity method in archaeological prospection: methodical comments on selected case studies from crypt and tomb detection

• Published in: Archaeological prospection Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 415 - 431
• Main Authors: Pašteka, Roman, Pánisová, Jaroslava, Zahorec, Pavol, Papčo, Juraj, Mrlina, Jan, Fraštia, Marek, Vargemezis, George, Kušnirák, David, Zvara, Ivan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-10-2020
• Subjects: Archaeology; Bouguer anomaly; Cavitation; cavity; Cemeteries; crypt; data processing; Electrical resistivity; Geophysics; gravimetry; Gravity effects; Gravity meters; interpretation
• ISSN: 1075-2196; 1099-0763
• DOI: 10.1002/arp.1787

Detailed and precise measurement of the Earth's gravity field (microgravity method) can be effectively used for the detection and quantification of subsurface voids and/or cavities. There exist a variety of successful applications of the microgravity method in near surface geophysics, namely in geotechnical, environmental and archaeological prospection. Using state‐of‐the‐art ‘microgal’ relative gravity meters, cavities of several metres in each dimension (positioned at a similar depth) can be detected and interpreted. Such objects produce negative anomalies with amplitudes of several tens of microGals (1 microGal = 10−8 m s−2). This contribution is focused on a methodological overview of the most important acquisition and processing steps in archaeological microgravimetry. In the processing of acquired gravimetrical data into a Bouguer anomaly, the so‐called building correction plays an important role, because the gravitational effect of building masses can produce false, usually negative anomalies. Several selected methods for quantitative interpretation are presented, these are based on depth estimation and density modelling. These interpretation methods give satisfactory results in the case of these type of negative anomalies that are caused by subsurface cavities. Microgravimetry can obtain good support from electromagnetic and electrical methods, mainly from ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography, respectively. Finally, we present successful case‐studies of microgravimetrical detection of crypts in various churches from the Middle Ages and period of Modern History, surveyed during recent decades in Slovakia and Czechia.