Do socially responsible firms provide more readable disclosures in annual reports?

• Published in: Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 1009 - 1018
• Main Authors: Ben‐Amar, Walid, Belgacem, Ines
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bognor Regis Wiley Periodicals Inc 01-09-2018
• Subjects: agency theory; Annual reports; Complexity; corporate social responsibility; disclosure; Empirical analysis; Ethical standards; Management Discussion & Analysis; Management reports; management's discussion and analysis; readability; Social responsibility; Stock exchanges
• ISSN: 1535-3958; 1535-3966
• DOI: 10.1002/csr.1517

This paper examines the relationship between the adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and the syntactic complexity of the management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) section of the annual report. Based on stakeholder and agency perspectives, we offer an empirical test of two competing hypotheses. First, we may expect socially responsible firms to provide transparent disclosures because this reflects a firm's commitment to high ethical standards. In contrast, the agency perspective predicts that managers engage in CSR for self‐interest purposes and that CSR‐oriented firms will be more likely to attempt to mislead stakeholders about the firm's actual performance through complex narrative disclosures.
Based on a sample of large firms listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, our results show a positive association between corporate social performance and the MD&A's textual complexity. Consistent with the agency perspective, our findings suggest that managers may engage in CSR opportunistically and use complex narrative disclosures in an impression management strategy.