Developing a ridge estimator for the gamma regression model
The ridge regression model has been consistently demonstrated to be an attractive shrinkage method to reduce the effects of multicollinearity. The gamma regression model is a very popular model in the application when the response variable is positively skewed. However, it is known that multicolline...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of chemometrics Vol. 32; no. 10 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-10-2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The ridge regression model has been consistently demonstrated to be an attractive shrinkage method to reduce the effects of multicollinearity. The gamma regression model is a very popular model in the application when the response variable is positively skewed. However, it is known that multicollinearity negatively affects the variance of maximum likelihood estimator of the gamma regression coefficients. To address this problem, a gamma ridge regression model has been proposed. In this study, a new estimator is developed by proposing a modification of Jackknife estimator with gamma ridge regression model. Our Monte Carlo simulation results and the real data application suggest that the proposed estimator can bring significant improvement relative to other competitor estimators, in absolute bias and mean squared error.
This study deals with the problem of the presence of multicollinearity in regression modeling. The gamma regression model is a very popular model in the application when the response variable is positively skewed. In this study, a new estimator is developed by proposing a modification of Jackknife estimator with gamma ridge regression model. The simulation results and the real data application reveal that the proposed estimator can bring significant improvement relative to other competitor estimators, in absolute bias and mean squared error. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0886-9383 1099-128X |
DOI: | 10.1002/cem.3054 |