Role of progesterone concentrations during early follicular development in beef cattle: II. Ovulatory follicle growth and pregnancy rates

• Published in: Animal reproduction science Vol. 196; pp. 69 - 76
• Main Authors: Abreu, F.M., Geary, T.W., Coutinho da Silva, M.A., Cruppe, L.H., Mussard, M.L., Madsen, C.A., Martins, T., Bridges, G.A., Harstine, B.R., Day, M.L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01-09-2018
• Subjects: Animals; Beef cows; Cattle - physiology; Conception rate; Dinoprost; Estrus Synchronization - physiology; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Insemination, Artificial; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Progesterone; Progesterone - blood; Progesterone - physiology; Used CIDR; Conception rate; Progesterone; Used CIDR; Beef cows
• ISSN: 0378-4320; 1873-2232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.06.011

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the role of relatively lesser and greater progesterone (P4) concentrations during early follicular development on ovulatory follicle growth and pregnancy rate in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, time of ovulation was synchronized with the 5 d CO-Synch + CIDR (Controlled Internal Drug Release) program in multiparous cows (n = 241). Six days after the 2nd GnRH injection of the pre-synchronization program (d 0), ablation of follicles ≥ 5 mm in the ovaries was performed and cows were assigned to receive either a previously used CIDR and 2x-25 mg PGF2α doses 8 h apart (LoP4), or a new CIDR (HiP4). On d 5, CIDR were removed from all cows, 2x-25 mg PGF2α were administered, and estrous detection tail paint was applied. Timed artificial insemination (TAI) was performed on d 8. On d 5, P4 concentrations were greater (P <  0.01) in the HiP4 (4.9 ± 0.13 ng/mL) than LoP4 (1.0 ± 0.06 ng/mL) treatment group. Conversely, d 5 estradiol (E2) concentrations and follicular diameter were greater (P <  0.01) in the LoP4 (5.0 ± 0.23 pg/mL and 8.9 ± 0.20 mm) than HiP4 (1.5 ± 0.12 pg/mL and 7.4 ± 0.15 mm) treatment group. Follicular diameter at TAI (12.0 ± 0.12 mm, Table 1) and TAI pregnancy rate did not differ (P >  0.10) between treatment groups. In Experiment 2, a new follicular wave was induced with estradiol benzoate on d -7, and cows (n = 275) were assigned on d 0 to receive 25 mg PGF2α and either have the CIDR replaced with a new CIDR (HiP4) or the used CIDR was left in place (LoP4).Furthermore, all cows received GnRH on d 0. The CIDRs were removed from all cows on d 5 and two doses of -25 mg PGF2α were administered. Estrous detection combined with AI 12 h later (Estrus-AI) was performed for 60 h after CIDR removal with TAI coupled with GnRH administration at 72 h if estrus was not detected. The concentrations of P4 on d 5 were greater (P <  0.01) in the HiP4 (2.8 ± 0.10 ng/ml) than LoP4 (1.7 ± 0.05 ng/mL) treatment group. For cows that were detected in estrus after PGF2α administration, estrous response (83.5%) and interval to estrus (55.0 ± 0.5 h) did not differ between treatment groups. Pregnancy rate (combined Estrus-AI and TAI) that resulted from breeding at the time of the synchronized time of estrus was similar between treatment groups (HiP4: 77.1%; LoP4: 82.3%). In conclusion, differences in P4 concentrations during early follicular development do not effect pregnancy rate in beef cows when the cows are inseminated at the time of a synchronized estrus if the cows have similar intervals of proestrus.