A Pilot Study: Free Flap Atrophy in Tongue Reconstruction Using 3D Volumetric Analysis

Objective: To identify factors influencing volume change in non-osseous oral free flap reconstruction using postoperative cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional segmentation of the free flap’s muscular and adipose tissue content. Methods: Oral tongue free flap reconstruction cases (2014-2019) wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology Vol. 133; no. 3; pp. 253 - 260
Main Authors: Gewirtz, Jordan I., Zhao, Songzhu, Brock, Guy, Luttrull, Michael D., Sethuraman, Shruthi, Kang, Stephen Y., VanKoevering, Kyle K., Seim, Nolan B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-03-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To identify factors influencing volume change in non-osseous oral free flap reconstruction using postoperative cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional segmentation of the free flap’s muscular and adipose tissue content. Methods: Oral tongue free flap reconstruction cases (2014-2019) were reviewed with inclusion of patients with 3 postoperative, cross-sectional imaging studies with 1 within 6 months, 1 within 1 year, and 1 that spanned 2 years post-reconstruction. Exclusion criteria included recurrence, significant dental artifact, bony reconstruction, and flap failure. Demographics, risk factors, and surgical/clinical treatments were identified. Flap volumes were measured using Materialise MIMICS. Results: Twenty-two patients met strict inclusion criteria. Four flaps were anterolateral thighs and 18 radial forearms. Median percent volume loss greater than 2 years post-reconstruction was 53.2% overall, 58.1% for radial forearms, and 45.4% for ALTs (21.4% for adipose tissue and 57.4% for muscular tissue). Univariate analysis revealed glossectomy amount was associated with percent volume loss (P = .0417). Each successive postoperative month, the flap decreased by 1.54% (P < .0001). Checking for the interaction effect, the percent of flap loss across time was different for glossectomy amount (P = .0093), obesity status (P = .0431), and base of tongue involvement (P = .0472). Conclusion: Glossectomy type, and thus flap size, is a positive predictor for flap atrophy. Obesity and base of tongue involvement are negative predictors for flap atrophy. The amount of tissue loss may differ from classical teachings with median atrophy 53.2% greater than 2 years post-reconstruction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4894
1943-572X
DOI:10.1177/00034894231204720