Decoding, reading and writing: the double helix theory of teaching
This paper presents a new theory and model of the teaching of decoding, reading and writing. The first part of the paper reviews a selection of influential models of learning to read and write that to varying degrees have been used as the basis for approaches to teaching, including the Simple View o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Literacy (Oxford, England) Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 256 - 266 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-09-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper presents a new theory and model of the teaching of decoding, reading and writing. The first part of the paper reviews a selection of influential models of learning to read and write that to varying degrees have been used as the basis for approaches to teaching, including the Simple View of Reading. As well as noting some strengths of the models in relation to children's learning, limitations are identified in terms of their applicability as models of teaching. The second part of the paper presents seven components that are central to teaching reading and writing derived from social, cultural and cognitive research and theory. Explanations for the relevance of the components are offered, and seminal and more recent research that underpin them summarised. The final part of the paper introduces a new theory and model of teaching, The Double Helix of Reading and Writing. It is argued that this model provides a rationale for a balanced approach to teaching, and an alternative to synthetic phonics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | We are grateful to Alice Bradbury, Teresa Cremin, Helen Hendry, Steve Higgins, and Homayra Rahimi for reading a draft of the paper and offering their comments, and for the comments from two anonymous peer reviewers. Dominic Wyse receives funding for the research centre The Helen Hamlyn Centre for Pedagogy (HHCP) from the Helen Hamlyn Trust (grant number UCL 556492). The authors are not aware of any conflicts of interest. |
ISSN: | 1741-4350 1741-4369 |
DOI: | 10.1111/lit.12367 |