Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring

Air pollution poses significant risk to environment and health. Air quality monitoring stations are often confined to a small number of locations due to the high cost of the monitoring equipment. They provide a low fidelity picture of the air quality in the city; local variations are overlooked. How...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement Vol. 70; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors: Ali, Sharafat, Glass, Tyrel, Parr, Baden, Potgieter, Johan, Alam, Fakhrul
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Air pollution poses significant risk to environment and health. Air quality monitoring stations are often confined to a small number of locations due to the high cost of the monitoring equipment. They provide a low fidelity picture of the air quality in the city; local variations are overlooked. However, recent developments in low-cost sensor technology and wireless communication systems like Internet of Things (IoT) provide an opportunity to use arrayed sensor networks to measure air pollution, in real time, at a large number of locations. This article reports the development of a novel low-cost sensor node that utilizes cost-effective electrochemical sensors to measure carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) concentrations and an infrared sensor to measure particulate matter (PM) levels. The node can be powered by either solar-recharged battery or mains supply. It is capable of long-range, low power communication over public or private long-range wide area network (LoRaWAN) IoT network and short-range high data rate communication over Wi-Fi. The developed sensor nodes were co-located with an accurate reference CO sensor for field calibration. The low-cost sensors' data, with offset and gain calibration, show good correlation with the data collected from the reference sensor. Multiple linear regression (MLR)-based temperature and humidity correction results in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 48.71% and R 2 of 0.607 relative to the reference sensor's data. Artificial neural network (ANN)-based calibration shows the potential for significant further improvement with MAPE of 38.89% and R 2 of 0.78 for leave-one-out cross-validation.
ISSN:0018-9456
1557-9662
DOI:10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109