Correlation between PD-L1 expression and MET gene amplification in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and no other actionable oncogenic driver

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are the most common type of lung cancer and can be classified according to the presence of mutually exclusive oncogenic drivers. The majority of NSCLC patients present a non-actionable oncogenic driver, and treatment resistance through the amplification of the MET...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oncotarget Vol. 12; no. 18; pp. 1802 - 1810
Main Authors: Domènech, Marta, Muñoz Marmol, Ana M., Mate, Jose Luis, Estival, Anna, Moran, Teresa, Cucurull, Marc, Saigi, Maria, Hernandez, Ainhoa, Sanz, Carolina, Hernandez-Gallego, Alba, Urbizu, Aintzane, Martinez-Cardus, Anna, Bernat, Adrià, Carcereny, Enric
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Impact Journals LLC 31-08-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are the most common type of lung cancer and can be classified according to the presence of mutually exclusive oncogenic drivers. The majority of NSCLC patients present a non-actionable oncogenic driver, and treatment resistance through the amplification of the MET proto-oncogene ( MET ) or the expression of programmed cell death protein 1 ligand (PD-L1) is common. Herein, we investigated the relation between MET gene amplification and PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced NSCLC and no other actionable oncogenic driver (i.e., EGFR , ALK , ROS1 ). Our retrospective observational study analyzed data from 48 patients (78% men, median age 66 years) admitted to the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Spain, between July 2015 and February 2019. Patients presenting MET amplification showed a higher proportion of PD-L1 expression (93% vs. 39%; p < 0.001) and overexpression (64% vs. 27%; p = 0.020) than those with non-amplified MET . PD-L1 expression was not significantly different when analyzed by sex ( p = 0.624), smoking history ( p = 0.429), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ( p = 0.597) Overall survival rates were not significantly affected by MET amplification (high and intermediate amplification vs low amplification and non-amplificated) ( p = 0.252) nor PD-L1 expression (> vs =< 50%) ( p = 0.893). In conclusion, a positive correlation was found between MET gene amplification and PD-L1 expression and highly expressed (above 50%) in patients with NSCLC and no other actionable oncogenic driver. It could be translated as new guided-treatment oportunities for these patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1949-2553
1949-2553
DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.28045