Land and Liberty in American Civil Society

Americans have relied upon freehold land ownership as one of the bases for maintaining individual liberty, adapting different forms of land ownership to that end under different circumstances as the economy, settlement patterns, and general environment have changed through four successive frontier s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Publius Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 1 - 29
Main Author: Elazar, Daniel J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Philadelphia Oxford University Press 01-10-1988
Center for the Study of Federalism
Center for the Study of Federalism, Temple University
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Americans have relied upon freehold land ownership as one of the bases for maintaining individual liberty, adapting different forms of land ownership to that end under different circumstances as the economy, settlement patterns, and general environment have changed through four successive frontier stages of American history. This article identifies the relationship between each frontier stage and prevailing patterns of land ownership as they relate to the maintenance of liberty. These patterns are further delineated by the different political subcultural groupings within the United States, beginning with the distinctive forms of land ownership and organization in New England, the Middle Atlantic states, the South, and the Spanish South west. The first three patterns have applied across the American continent, while the fourth has had to find means to survive within the dominant Anglo pattern that invaded the territory covered by the Spanish system. The article notes the relationship between these patterns and federal and state land law and the parallels between those patterns and the biblical approach to land organization and control. It also notes the special importance of land ownership and organization in a polity organized around the principles of territorial democracy.
Bibliography:ArticleID:18.4.1
ark:/67375/HXZ-SCBHDT23-0
istex:A233E81BBC61934AE3219BF299B4B2A924745A68
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-5950
1747-7107
1747-7107
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037744