Influence of Social Exclusion on Cool and Hot Inhibitory Control in Chinese College Students

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 20; no. 3; p. 2433
• Main Authors: Peng, Suhao, Ruan, Xinhui, Tao, Dan, Xuan, Bin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 30-01-2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Behavior; Cognition; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive ability; College students; Emotions; Emotions - physiology; Executive function; Experiments; Humans; Laboratories; Males; Mental health; Ostracism; Questionnaires; Reaction time; Reaction Time - physiology; Reaction time task; Response time; Self esteem; Social exclusion; Social Isolation - psychology; Stroop Test; Students; cool inhibitory control; Stroop task; ostracism; hot inhibitory control; social exclusion; Cyberball
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032433

Social exclusion can affect nearly every aspect of a person's mental health, both on an emotional and cognitive level. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether cool or hot inhibitory control capacity varied under social exclusion. More precisely, participants who had experienced and not experienced social exclusion were compared to explore the influence of social exclusion on cool and hot inhibitory controls. Social exclusion was induced through the use of a Cyberball game, and participants were divided into an exclusion group and an inclusion group. The number Stroop task and emotional face Stroop task were used to measure the cool and hot inhibitory control, respectively. In the cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading printed digits to identify the number of items presented in the array. In the hot Stroop task, participants had to inhibit the meaning of the word to identify the emotion displayed on the face. Reaction time, accuracy, and Stroop interference were analyzed to compare the inhibitory control between the exclusion group and the inclusion group. The results showed an extension of the response time in the exclusion group compared to the inclusion group. We found a higher interference effect in the number of Stroop tasks in the exclusion group than that in the inclusion group, but it was not significant in the emotional face Stroop task. The results suggest that the cognitive and emotional basis of inhibitory control may differ during social exclusion. The present findings expand our understanding of how social exclusion affects cool and hot inhibitory controls and their internal psychological mechanism.