A Queer Praxis for Peer Review
If, as I argue, student-to-student peer review is animated by "improvement imperatives" that make peer review a form of what Lauren Berlant calls "cruel optimism," then rhetoric and composition will need to imagine theories and structures for peer review that do not repeat cruel...
Saved in:
Published in: | College composition and communication Vol. 72; no. 2; pp. 306 - 332 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National Council of Teachers of English
01-12-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | If, as I argue, student-to-student peer review is animated by "improvement imperatives" that make peer review a form of what Lauren Berlant calls "cruel optimism," then rhetoric and composition will need to imagine theories and structures for peer review that do not repeat cruel attachments. I offer slow peer review as a strategy for queer rhetorical listening that maintains our commitments to peer review without the limitations created through the improvement imperative. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-096X |
DOI: | 10.58680/CCC202031039 |