A Comparison of the Effects of T and Macrophage-Like Suppressor Cells on Memory Cell Differentiation in Vitro

An adherent, phagocytic, non-T cell present in the spleen of BCG infected animals was found capable of inhibiting both primary and secondary cytotoxic responses to alloantigen in vitro. BCG-spleen cells were compared to suppressor T cell populations induced either by culturing spleen cells in 10% fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of immunology (1950) Vol. 121; no. 2; pp. 749 - 754
Main Authors: Klimpel, Gary R, Henney, Christopher S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Am Assoc Immnol 01-08-1978
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An adherent, phagocytic, non-T cell present in the spleen of BCG infected animals was found capable of inhibiting both primary and secondary cytotoxic responses to alloantigen in vitro. BCG-spleen cells were compared to suppressor T cell populations induced either by culturing spleen cells in 10% fetal calf serum for periods up to 5 days or by stimulation of splenocytes for 48 hr with 5 µg/ml Con A. These comparative studies revealed that i) all suppressor cell populations were less effective at inhibiting secondary cytotoxic responses than they were at suppressing primary responses. ii) BCG-induced suppressor macrophages were as effective on a spleen cell basis as Con A-induced suppressor T cells. Both of these populations were superior to suppressor T cells induced by culture in the absence of added mitogen, which had little or no effect on secondary responses. More importantly, both BCG and Con A-induced suppressor cells were capable of inhibiting the development of cytotoxic cells in cultures containing mitomycin C-treated “memory” cells. Thus, these suppressor cells can prevent nonproliferative events associated with cytotoxic T cell differentiation. It is therefore conceivable that the widely reported anti-proliferative action of suppressor cells is a secondary effect, resulting from suppression of a differentiative event that precedes cell proliferation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1767
1550-6606
DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.121.2.749