Different Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers Based on the Same Order GPI Observer

As the higher order or generalized extended state observer (ESO), generalized proportional-integral (GPI) observer (GPIO) haves been proposed to enhance the active disturbance rejection (ADR) control (ADRC) system's disturbance rejection ability. However, different ADR controllers can be deduce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982) Vol. 69; no. 11; pp. 10969 - 10983
Main Authors: Zuo, Yuefei, Chen, Jiahao, Zhu, Xiaoyong, Lee, Christopher H. T.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 01-11-2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As the higher order or generalized extended state observer (ESO), generalized proportional-integral (GPI) observer (GPIO) haves been proposed to enhance the active disturbance rejection (ADR) control (ADRC) system's disturbance rejection ability. However, different ADR controllers can be deduced based on the same order GPIO, resulting in different dynamic performances. In this article, ten different ADR controllers based on the fourth order GPIO are present. In order to reveal the relationship between these ADR controllers and the conventional ADR controllers based on the third order ESO, six different third-order-ESO-based ADR controllers are present and compared with the fourth-order-ESO-based ADR controllers. To ease the comparison between different ADRC systems, a common expression is built for different ADR controllers. A novel frequency-domain analysis method is also introduced to reveal how the observer and feedback control law affects the closed-loop control system's dynamic performance. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified on the test bench based on dSPACE DS1103.
ISSN:0278-0046
1557-9948
DOI:10.1109/TIE.2021.3118378