Dependability of Electrode to Modiolus Distance in Patients Specific Electrode Selection: A Cadaveric Model Study

Objective This study aims to discern the disparities in the electrode‐to‐modiolus distance (EMD) between cochleostomy and round window approaches when performed sequentially in the same temporal bone. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the cochlear metrics that contribute to these differences...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 134; no. 11; pp. 4736 - 4744
Main Authors: Sharma, Vidhu, Das K, Nidhin, Jangra, Anupriya, Tiwari, Sarbesh, Khera, Pushpinder, Soni, Kapil, Dixit, Shilpi G., Nayyar, Ashish K., Goyal, Amit
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-11-2024
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This study aims to discern the disparities in the electrode‐to‐modiolus distance (EMD) between cochleostomy and round window approaches when performed sequentially in the same temporal bone. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the cochlear metrics that contribute to these differences. Methodology A cross‐sectional study was conducted, involving the sequential insertion of a 12‐electrode array through both round window and cochleostomy approaches in cadaveric temporal bones. Postimplantation high‐resolution CT scans were employed to calculate various parameters. Results A total of 12 temporal bones were included in the imaging analysis, revealing a mean cochlear duct length of 32.892 mm. The EMD demonstrated a gradual increase from electrode 1 (C1) in the apex (1.9 ± 0.07 mm; n = 24) to electrode 12 (C12) in the basal turn (4.6 ± 0.24 mm; n = 12; p < 0.01). Significantly higher EMD values were observed in the cochleostomy group. Correlation analysis indicated a strong positive correlation between EMD and cochlear perimeter (CP) (rs = 0.64; n = 12; p = 0.03) and a strong negative correlation with the depth of insertion (DOI) in both the middle and basal turns (rs = − 0.78; n = 20; p < 0.01). Additionally, EMD showed a strong negative correlation with the DOI‐CP ratio (rs = −0.81; n = 12; p < 0.01). Conclusion The cochleostomy group exhibited a significantly higher EMD compared with the round window group. The strong negative correlation between EMD and DOI‐CP ratio suggests that in larger cochleae with shallower insertions, EMD is greater than in smaller cochleae with deeper insertions. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 134:4736–4744, 2024 An article describing the variability of electrode to modiolus distance among various window of insertion in cochlear implantation, it's association with various cochlear parameters and its significance in the selection of patient specific electrode.
Bibliography:The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.31565