Chest Tube Placement of Secondary Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis: Overcoming Challenging Anatomy in the Laryngectomy Patient

• Published in: Journal of personalized medicine Vol. 14; no. 10; p. 1021
• Main Authors: Shires, Courtney B, Schertzer, Joseph S, Ottenstein, Lauren, Harris, Tricia, Sebelik, Merry E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 24-09-2024; MDPI
• Subjects: Anatomy; Cancer patients; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Chest; Chest tubes; Endoscopes; Endoscopy; Esophagus; Fibrosis; Fistula; General anesthesia; Implants, Artificial; Kyphosis; Larynx; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Meta-analysis; Patient satisfaction; Prostheses; Prosthesis; Radiation; Rehabilitation; Speech; Success; chest tube; flexible transnasal esophagoscopy; tracheoesophageal puncture; trismus; laryngectomy
• ISSN: 2075-4426; 2075-4426
• DOI: 10.3390/jpm14101021

Total laryngectomy is used to cure advanced larynx cancer in many patients. The removal of the larynx requires the rehabilitation of the patient's ability to communicate, and one common method is to place a tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) as a secondary procedure after the patient has completed cancer treatment. The traditional technique utilizes a rigid esophagoscope for access, but this can prove difficult in many patients who have kyphosis, scarring of the neck, or trismus. We describe a technique to allow TEP placement in these challenging patients that does not utilize rigid esophagoscopy to access the tracheoesophageal puncture site.
For more than 15 years, the senior authors of this study have used this technique in patients in whom traditional methods of TEP with rigid esophagoscope were unsuccessful or not attempted due to the anticipated high probability of failure. The ease of this technique has prompted its use for all patients undergoing secondary TEP placement in their practice. The technique is described in detail in the Methods section below.
The described method has been successfully utilized to place TEPs in many patients with challenging anatomy. There have been no failed placements, including a patient with severe trismus who was able to have a TEP placed by placing the chest tube and flexible endoscope transnasally. Further, because of precise visualization and ease of the technique, there have been no observed complications of injury to the pharyngoesophageal lumen or creation of a false passage.
The use of a chest tube and flexible scope allows for the protection of the pharyngoesophageal lumen, precise visualization and placement of the puncture, and avoidance of a false tracheoesophageal passage, all while minimizing the need for extension of the patient's neck. This has proven ideal for patients suffering the consequences of cancer treatment such as cervical scarring, fibrosis, kyphosis, and trismus.